Legal Opinion

Dyes v. Dyes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 1984No. AZ-17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Appellant takes an interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s grant of a motion for protective order and partial grant of a motion for judgment on the pleadings. We dismiss the appeal on our own motion.

The protective order is neither a final order nor a nonfinal, interlocutory order reviewable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. In addition, the protective order does not warrant the exercise of our certiorari jurisdiction. City of Williston v. Roadlander, 425 So.2d 1175, 1176 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

The order partially granting appel-lee’s motion for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Williston v. RoadlanderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Sgrignuoili v. BarakatDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allan v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Steve Morales v. Reservoir Media Management, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API