Lippincott v. Supreme Council A. L. H.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
At Law. On motion for new trial, and for judgment in favor of -defendant notwithstanding the verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
This case presents a question that did not arise in Supreme Council, etc., v. Black, 123 Fed. 650, 59 C. C. A. 414, nor in Daix v. Supreme Council (C. C.) 127 Fed. 374, recently affirmed by-the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (130 Fed. 101), namely, the right of a member of the defendant order to rescind his contract after having once elected not to rescind. The ■facts are undisputed. The plaintiff, upon receiving notice of the •attempted reduction of his certificate from $5,000 to $2,000, in accordance with the by-law passed in August, 1900, refused to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Mayor of Baltimore v. LeffermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846
- Lonergan v. BufordSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Supreme Council A. L. H. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davies v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932