Legal Opinion

In Re West Barton Street Sewer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1931No. 22792. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, the City of Seattle, has moved the court to dismiss this appeal, on the ground that it was not taken within the time prescribed by the statute governing appeals of this kind. Upon consideration of the motion, we conclude that it must be granted.

The appellants are the owners of property specially assessed by the city to pay the cost of a sewer improvement constructed under the provisions of ch. 98, Laws 1911, p. 441 (Rem. Comp. Stat., § 9352 et seq.) as amended by ch. 97, Laws 1929, p. 188. The appellants, feeling aggrieved at the assessments levied upon their several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meade v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Sherman v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Residents Opposed Turbines v. State EfsecWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Dept. P.S. v. Nor. Pac. R. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State ex rel. Department of Public Service v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API