Legal Opinion

Raffield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 1978No. W-412PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

362 So.2d 138 (1978)

Leveral "Sparky" RAFFIELD, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. W-412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 8, 1978.

Guillermon A. Ruiz and Philip J. Padovano, of Ruiz & Padovano, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

The facts of this case are sufficiently set forth in prior opinions entered in this cause.[1] Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, the sole issue for our determination is whether Raffield consented to the warrantless search of his…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Talavera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Raffield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  4. United States v. GregoryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Raffield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MorsmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Major v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Bathurst v. TurnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Correa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Stone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API