Legal Opinion

Austin v. Manning

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 26, 1950No. 4-9316PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.

The City of DeQueen, under authority of Act No. 71 of 1949 (Ark. Stats., 1949 Supp., §§ 19-4801 to 19-4812), 1 adopted a city ordinance authorizing construction of a municipal gas transmission and distribution system, held a special election approving the ordinance by a vote of 956 to one, and is proceeding to sell bonds called for by the ordinance to finance the gas system. Plaintiff as a citizen and taxpayer asserted that Act 71 and the ordinance enacted under it are invalid and asked the Chancery Court to enjoin defendants Mayor, Recorder and aldermen of DeQueen (hereinafter identified as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jernigan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. McCutchen v. Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Watkins v. Eureka SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Williams v. Harris, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wayland v. SnappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Eaton v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. State v. SheldonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Kenny Halfacre v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API