Legal Opinion

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 26, 1957No. 60927; protests 257815-K, etc. (Seattle)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollxson, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of these protests, which were consolidated for trial and disposition, was assessed with duty by the collector of customs at the rate of 20 per ceDtum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 405 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Presidential proclamation relating to the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739, for “Plywood * * *: Other [than certain named types of which the present importations are not one].”

The merchandise, in fact, consists of one-eighth inch thick 3-ply lauan plywood, cut to or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John A. Hunter Hardwood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Delaware Paper Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. General Shipping & Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. J. B. Henriques, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API