Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carter v. DONE

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 15, 2012No. 20100478-CAPublished

1DissentMcHUGH, Presiding Judge

137 I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority because I am convinced that the Carters did not establish all of the elements necessary to prevail on a claim of trespass.1 Furthermore, even if the Carters had proved that the Dones were Hable in trespass, I would reverse the award of damages.

L Liability

138 "The essential element of trespass is physical invasion of the land; [t]respass is a possessory action." Walker Drug Co. v. La Sal Oil Co., 972 P.2d 1238, 1243 (Utah 1998) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted). As the Restatement of Torts explains, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. RawlingsUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Walker Drug Co., Inc. v. La Sal Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Magana v. Dave Roth ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API