Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2011No. Docket No. 295243PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the parties’ divorce judgment. We affirm.

Plaintiff and defendant had been married for more than 40 years. During their marriage, they accumulated substantial assets together. Extensive discovery was conducted, and eventually the parties entered into a property-settlement agreement (PSA) on August 25, 2009. The PSA divided all the parties’ assets, including all retirement accounts. The value of defendant’s individual retirement account (IRA) was calculated using his February 2009 IRA statement, which had been disclosed during discovery. However, by the time the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamade v. Sunoco, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Harbor Park Market, Inc v. GrondaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Duval v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hamade v. SUNOCO, INC.(R & M)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Marshall v. MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Clark v Al-AminMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Kaftan v. KaftanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Bennett v. Amazon.Com Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Charkeia Shannon v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Citizens Insurance Company of the Midwest v. McNeeleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API