Legal Opinion

Multz v. Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Lena Price‘and another, from a judgment of the Suprem'fe Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 22d day of January, 1902, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial, at the New York Special Term, adjudging a conveyance theretofore made by the defendant Lena Price to the defendant Moses Price to be fraudiilent and -null and void as against the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This is a judgment creditor’s action to set aside a conveyance by á wife to her husband alleged to'have been made in fraud' of creditors. The defendants were both examined in proceedings supplementary,to execution issued against, the wife." Upon the trial of this action the examination of the wife was received in evidence generally, over.the objection and under exception in behalf- of the. husband that as to him the evidence given by his wife was hearsay, and that her statements and declarations long after the conveyance could not affect his title. This evidence was properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lent v. . ShearNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Kalish v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Lewis v. BoardmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Curley v. QuirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Multz v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API