Legal Opinion

Houston v. Monumental Radio, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1930No. [No. 60, October Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOeeutt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Baltimore City on a directed verdict in favor of the defendants in an action of general assumpsit brought by George Porter Houston, 3rd, against the Monumental Radio, Incorporated, and R. V. O.-'Swartwout, for services which the plaintiff claimed to have rendered in connection with the operation of a radio station in Baltimore City. The declaration contains the six common counts, and there was filed with it a bill of particulars which set out in detail the dates and periods of the alleged services as well as the value placed upon them…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. ThirstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  2. Day v. CatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. W., B. A.R.R. Co. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  4. Baker v. LauterbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  5. Cone v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Wolfe v. Lamar & Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Dusenka v. DusenkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API