Legal Opinion

Fortin v. Fortin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1965No. 5222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

“Generally speaking, the concealment of a previous marriage or divorce, or a misrepresentation with respect thereto, is not such a fraud as will constitute ground for annulment.” 3 Nelson, Divorce and Annulment s. 31.41 (2d ed. 1945). It is the general rule supported by the weight of authority that the concealment of a previous marriage terminated by divorce is an insufficient ground for annulment. Cassin v. Cassin, 264 Mass. 28; Trask v. Trask, 114 Me. 60; Annots. 23 A.L.R. 180; 33 A.L.R. 835; 58 A.L.R. 326; 46 Harv. L. Rev. 1034 (1933).

In this state annulment of a marriage for fraud is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Oswald v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  3. Trask v. TraskSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  4. Cassin v. CassinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Paula Geraghty and Kenneth GeraghtySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  2. Wolfe v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Wolfe v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Wolfe v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API