Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re the Claim of Strauss
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 3, 1996Published
1Dissent
Mikoll, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent.
If an employee fails to follow his employer’s stated rules and policies or repeatedly commits negligent acts, either scenario constitutes misconduct (see, Matter of Gallo [Hudacs], 206 AD2d 649). The record amply supports a finding of misconduct. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Claim of GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994