Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 17, 1925No. 9003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). No issue is taken to the history of the engine from May 20th to December 15th. The motion to remand, in the absence of denials, is in the nature of a demurrer to the petition, and admits the truth of the allegation. Bradshaw v. Bowden (D. C.) 226 F. 323, and cases cited.

An allegation in a complaint of interstate commerce relation, not supported in fact, to defeat removal, is a fraud, and will not defeat removal. Wilson v. R. I. & S. Co., 257 U. S. 92, 42 S. Ct. 35, 66 L. Ed. 144; Gt. Northern Ry. v. Alexander, 246 U. S. 276, 38 S. Ct. 237, 62 L. Ed. 713;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Atchison, T. &. S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API