Legal Opinion

Schilling v. Carter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The plaintiff brought this action in a justice’s court in Stearns ■county, to enforce a lien claimed to exist upon certain farm products. ■On appeal to the district court the action was tried by Collins, J., without a jury, and judgment for defendant, directed and entered, from which the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The defendant is the owner of a certain farm, which was cultivated by one Heaton during the season of 1884, under an agreement between them by the terms of which the latter was to •cultivate and harvest the crops thereon, the title and ownership of which were to be and remain in the defendant, who agreed to deliver to Heaton one-half of the same in consideration of the faithful ful-filment of the stipulations in the agreement on his part. The trial ■court finds that the parties had a dispute touching matters growing •out of this contract, which was settled by arbitration, September 15, 1884,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kruse v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liljengren v. EgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API