Legal Opinion

Harri v. Isaac

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1940No. 8,102PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Johnson

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment on the pleadings. Defendant’s general demurrer having been overruled, he filed a general denial and later moved for judgment on the pleadings upon several grounds, the only one of which we need consider is that the complaint does not set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against defendant.

The complaint alleges that at the time in question defendant was the sheriff of Treasure county, Montana, and plaintiff was the owner of certain oil well pipe theretofore used by the Montana Belle Oil and Gas Company in Custer county, under a lease…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleming v. LockwoodMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Edquest v. Tripp & Dragstedt Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hennessy Co. v. WagnerMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. National Bank v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dorwart v. CarawayMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Peasley Transfer & Storage Co. v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Holmes v. Artists Rights Enforcement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Collins v. State, Dept. of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Waite v. HolmesMontana Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API