Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
SHENK, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the opinion and judgment as to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District tax; and as to the general tax insofar as the result is tax exemption. But I am not in agreement with those portions of the opinion which lead to nonexemption from the general tax. In the latter are included the thrift shop and the buildings under construction. In my opinion the proper application of the law should result in tax exemption of these items from the general tax.
The rule of construction to discover a tax exemption applies only until the meaning of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Village of Hibbing v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Boston Society of Redemptorist Fathers v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Dougherty v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.