Myers v. Highway 46 Holdings, L.L.C.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, C.J.
Mr. Webster defines “prolix” as being “unduly prolonged or drawn out” or “given to verbosity and diffuseness in speaking or writing,” and “prolixity” as “the quality or state of being prolix.” Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary 681 (1969). If one would truly seek to understand prolixity, however, one would want to review the second amended counterclaim and cross-claim filed by the appellants, Michael Myers and Jacqueline Myers, in this case. The document spans an impressive 226 pages, 36 counts, and 901 paragraphs.1 When the trial court considered, and ultimately granted with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kozel v. OstendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Samuels v. King Motor Co. of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Kohn v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Florida Nat. Organization for Women, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Dimick v. RayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Highway 46 Holdings, LLC v. MyersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Myers v. Highway 46 Holdings, L.L.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015