Legal Opinion

Moore v. Rock Creek Oil Corp.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1933No. 1400-6023PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY, Judge.

Plaintiffs in error were stockholders in the Rock Creek Oil Corporation. They made proper demand upon the president and secretary of said company to be permitted to examine its books and records. These officers of the company notified plaintiffs in error that they would permit them to examine such books and records upon certain specified conditions. The conditions named were clearly such as the company had no right to impose against stockholders seeking the statutory right of inspection.

The issuance of a writ of mandamus was sought in this proceeding to compel said corporation to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Westerman v. MimsTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. United States Ex Rel. Turner v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Foster v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State Ex Rel. Costelo v. Middlesex Banking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Callahan v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY v. LoughridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Trustmark Nat'l Bank v. Tegeler (In re Tegeler)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  5. State Ex Rel. Watkins v. CassellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API