Chapman v. Holding
Supreme Court of Alabama
This was an application for a certiorari to bring np a complete transcript, based on affidavits filed. These affidavits did not come into the Reporter’s hands, but the point decided sufficiently appears, without further reference to them.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In Branch Bank at Decatur v. Kinsey, 5 Ala. 9, a bill of exceptions was signed and sealed by the presiding judge during the term of the circuit court, at which the trial was had. .After the adjournment of the term the presiding judge certified another bill of exceptions, assuming thereby to correct the first. This court refused to consider the one last signed. The court said, “ when a bill of exceptions is allowed and sealed by the judge, it becomes a part of the record, is as much beyond his control, after the adjournment of the court, as any other part of the record.”
In Weir v. Hoss, 6 Ala.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Branch Bank at Decatur v. KinseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- Weir v. HossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pearce v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Edinburgh-American Land Mortgage Co. v. CanterburySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Ex parte NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Tracy's Administratrix v. Carver Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.