Legal Opinion

United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 7, 1955No. 152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

Libellant, United States of America (as owner of the Steamship P & T Pathfinder, hereinafter referred to as “Pathfinder” or “vessel”, ex U. S. S. Dupage and otherwise known as USMC Hull No. •389), has instituted this action for indemnity, civil and maritime, against the respondent, Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company, seeking to recover the sum of $14,691.53, plus interest and costs, alleged to be due by reason of claims paid by libellant to third parties arising out of cargo damage sustained on the first voyage of the vessel following its reconversion by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Compania De Navegacion Interior, S. A. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Otis Elevator Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. Daniel Construction Co. v. Welch Contracting Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
  3. Newport News Shipbuilding & Drydock Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  4. Parfait v. Swiftships, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API