Legal Opinion

IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX PROTEST OF HARE

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 2017No. Case 114,893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GURICH, V.C.J.

Facts & Procedural History

¶ 1 In November- 2004, Oklahoma voters passed State Question 713-Legislative Referendum 336, which implemented certain changes to the Oklahoma Tax Code. The new enactment included an income tax deduction for net capital gains derived from in-state property and business sales. The title of the new measure explained that it was amending 68 O.S. 2001 § 2358 and, inter alia, “providing [an] exemption for certain earnings of individual taxpayer[s].” Specifically the law authorized a deduction for selected capital gains that were included in a taxpayer’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. James A. Patterson and Dorothy A. Patterson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Russell v. Chase Investment Services, Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. OKLA. GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. CORPORATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX PROTEST OF HARESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. OKLA. GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. CORPORATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API