Legal Opinion
Hensel Phelps Construction v. Mirich
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 10, 1986No. 84-00644 & 83-08999; CA A37006PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Hensel Phelps Construction (Phelps) seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which affirmed the referee’s order holding it responsible for claimant’s back condition. The issue is whether claimant suffered an aggravation (the responsibility of Phelps) or a new injury (the responsibility of Kalt Manufacturing Company (Kalt)). We affirm.
On April 4, 1980, claimant suffered a dorsal lumbar strain while working for Phelps. He was awarded temporary but not permanent disability compensation. In the interval between recuperating from the Phelps injury and beginning at Kalt, claimant worked…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Consolidated Freightways v. FousheeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Crowe v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. PhippsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Stevens Equipment Co. v. American FabricatorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Schwabe, Williamson & WyattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Mission Insurance v. DundonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Cameron Logging v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.