Legal Opinion

Hedtke v. Kukuk

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1923No. 12271PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, O.

This was an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court of Noble county, whereby the plaintiff in error seeks to recover the custody of his two minor children, Eva Leona Hedtke, age 10 years, and Walter Irvin Hedtke, age 5 years, the petition alleging they are now in the custody of Fred Kukuk and Annie Kukuk. The parties will be referred to as petitioner and respondent, as they appeared in the court below.

Upon trial had. petitioner demurred to the respondent’s evidence, and upon a judgment denying the writ, this cause is properly before this court for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Jamison v. Gilbert Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Wisener, Sheriff v. BurrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Ex Parte DavidgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scroggin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Roberts v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Brooks v. PrestonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Ex Parte HudspethSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API