Legal Opinion

Randall A. Hauter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 22, 2016No. Case 5D16-2912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Randall A. Hauter (the defendant) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. Determining that the defendant is entitled-to amend one facially insufficient claim and that a claim of cumulative error must be addressed, we remand on these two issues. In all other respects, we affirm.

The defendant was found guilty, by a jury, of one count of lewd or lascivious molestation of a child over twelve years of age (count I), and one count of lewd or lascivious molestation of a child under twelve years of age (count II). He was sentenced to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. Maxwell v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Alcorn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  5. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Batista-Irizarry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Stephen Elliot Drakus v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Anthony M. Wait v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Batista-Irizarry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Charles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API