Randall A. Hauter v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Randall A. Hauter (the defendant) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. Determining that the defendant is entitled-to amend one facially insufficient claim and that a claim of cumulative error must be addressed, we remand on these two issues. In all other respects, we affirm.
The defendant was found guilty, by a jury, of one count of lewd or lascivious molestation of a child over twelve years of age (count I), and one count of lewd or lascivious molestation of a child under twelve years of age (count II). He was sentenced to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Maxwell v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Alcorn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Batista-Irizarry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Stephen Elliot Drakus v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Anthony M. Wait v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Batista-Irizarry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Charles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.