Legal Opinion

Hackett v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 2015No. 14-855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

| tin this dispute over the ownership of land beneath a public road right-of-way, Murphy Exploration & Production Company (“Murphy”) appeals the grant of summary judgment declaring Robert Hackett and Kaye Breedlove Hackett owners of the disputed property. Murphy asserts that summary judgment is improper because the act of sale is ambiguous as to the parties’ intent. We agree. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the matter for further proceedings.

I

ISSUES

We are entreated to decide:

1. whether the district court erred in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Supreme Services v. Sonny Greer, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. Gray v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  5. Phipps v. SchuppSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hackett v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co. USALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Robert Wayne Hackett, Et Ux. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co. USALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API