Legal Opinion

Ian M. Cumming v. Glendon E. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1979No. 77-3871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

Glendon Johnson appeals a judgment of specific performance of an oral stock transfer agreement between Johnson’s brother Franklin, who was acting as Johnson’s agent, and the plaintiff, Ian Cumming. Johnson asserts that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, 1 that enforcement of the oral agreement was barred by the statute of frauds, and that his wife’s community property interest, in the disputed stock could not be transferred under the trial court’s order. We affirm the district court.

Johnson and his wife, Bobette Johnson, are Texas residents. Cumming…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Texas Gulf Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bowers Steel, Inc. v. DeBrookeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Baldassarre v. Rare Metals Derivatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Griggs v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  5. Exxon Corp. v. RaetzerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. John Gould v. Artisoft, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Village of Kaktovik v. WattCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Schoen v. Consumers United Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  4. Byrd v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Okonko v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API