Legal Opinion
Dennett v. Archuleta
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided January 11, 2013No. C.A. No. 12-424-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.
I. Facts
In 2009, Michael Dennett, a resident of Middletown, Rhode Island, was being treated by the Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center (the “Providence VA”) in Providence, Rhode Island when test results showed elevated levels of a prostate-specific antigen (“PSA”). (First Am. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 7; Pl.’s Obj. to Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dennett v. ArchuletaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2013
- CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021
- Swiss RE International SE v. Park & Associates, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025