Marchio v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $1,500 for changing a street grade in front of defendant’s lots hy which they were left about 25 feet above the grade of the street. The case was tried before Ensign, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $500. From an'order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Per curiam
Action hy plaintiff, claiming to he the owner of two lots in Duluth fronting on Commonwealth avenue, to recover damages to the lots caused hy a change of grade of the street. The case was tried to a jury, and a verdict for plaintiff returned. Defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The sole contention of the city on this appeal is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the title to the lots was in plaintiff. The answer denied plaintiff’s title, but the evidence was undisputed that plaintiff was in possession and had been for some time. In addition to the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Gillespie v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917