Legal Opinion

Clarey v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1933No. Appeal, 377PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The City of Philadelphia, under an ordinance approved July 5, 1928, erected a convention hall on certain property owned by it, known as the “Museum Grounds.” A taxpayer, John A. Clarey, filed this bill in equity against the city, and its officers and agents charged with the management of the hall, to restrain them from permitting its use for the exhibition of boxing, wrestling, or other sporting events conducted for private gain or profit. Preliminary objections were sustained, whereupon complainant filed an amended bill. To the bill as amended, defendants also…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Worden v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Bell v. City of PlattevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bates v. BassettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  4. Stone v. City of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Davis v. Inhabitants of RockportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Green v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Martin v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. In Re Estate of Eliza Gallagher, Dec'd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Colwell v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Clapp v. JaffreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API