Shakman v. Democratic Organization
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
*898ORDER
Before the Court is the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment with respect to costs and partial summary judgment with respect to attorneys’ fees. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs’ motion with respect to costs is granted and their motion with respect to attorneys’ fees is granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTS
This is a class action brought under the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, challenging the patronage practices of the regular Democratic and Republican Party organizations in most of the Northern…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- 28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 19, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,459 Alta Chrapliwy, and Cross-Appellees v. Uniroyal, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986