Legal Opinion

Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1984No. 48 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

This Court granted appellant Transworld Airlines’ petition for allowance of appeal to resolve a mixed question of law and fact, viz. whether an injury occurring to an employee in the first floor lobby of a multi-purpose complex, the only appropriate building exit at the time her duties ended, is an injury occurring on the employer’s premises, as that term is defined in Section 301(c) of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, § 301(c), as amended, 77 P.S. § 411(1) (Supp. 1983-84). The Workmen’s Compensation Referee and the Appeal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Fashion Hosiery Shops v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Cleaning Corp., Inc. v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Thompson v. Law Offices of Alan JosephSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. McMillan v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Thompson v. Law Offices of Alan JosephCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  5. Dawn Mcmillan v. State Mutual Life Assurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API