Legal Opinion

K Mart Corp. v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 27, 1988No. 76978PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Dixie Griffin sued K Mart for malicious prosecution (OCGA § 51-7-40), false arrest (OCGA § 51-7-1), and false imprisonment (OCGA § 51-7-20), but the case was tried only on the first count. K Mart ap peals from the judgment for Ms. Griffin.

The first five enumerations of error attack the sufficiency of the evidence. Thus, as presented by the parties, and given the law on malicious prosecution and the merchant’s statutory defense (OCGA § 51-7-60), the question boils down to whether there is any evidence of probable cause and malice. According to the code, both must be established…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pendley v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Darnell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Hearn v. BatchelorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. United Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willis v. BrassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Barber v. H & H Muller Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. K Mart Corp. v. AdamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Barnette v. Coastal Hematology & Oncology, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Brown v. Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API