Legal Opinion
State v. Jackson
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 2004No. 29125PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Chief Judge.
Curtis Edward Jackson appeals from his judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia. Jackson contends that the district court improperly accepted his waiver of his right to counsel without having adequately cautioned him concerning the dangers of self-representation. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
I
FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Jackson was charged with possession of methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c), and possession of drug paraphernalia, I.C. § 87-2734A, and the prosecution requested a persistent violator…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Satterwhite v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AverettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. WilliamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. JacksonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
- State of Idaho v. John Cornell Anderson, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Dougherty IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.