Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Pearl River Valley Water Dist.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2004No. 2002-CA-02090-SCTPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

865 So.2d 357 (2004)

Sandra COCKRELL

v.

PEARL RIVER VALLEY WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT.

No. 2002-CA-02090-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

February 5, 2004.

William P. Featherston, Jr., Ridgeland, attorney for appellant.

J. Stephen Wright, attorney for appellee.

Before PITTMAN, C.J., WALLER, P.J., and CARLSON, J.

CARLSON, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. The Pearl River Valley Water Supply District ("District") was granted summary judgment pursuant to the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA) dismissing with prejudice all claims asserted against it by Sandra Cockrell. Cockrell appeals the ruling of the circuit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Donald v. Amoco Production Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Daniels v. GNB, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Barnes v. Singing River Hosp. SystemsMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Educational Placement Services v. WilsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wallace v. Town of RaleighMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Price v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Arceo v. TolliverMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. CHILDREN'S MEDICAL GROUP, PA v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Martin v. LoweryMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. City of Jackson v. SandiferMississippi Supreme Court · 2013

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API