Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner was found guilty after a Tier III hearing of violating inmate rules 106.10, refusing a direct order (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [7] [i]), and 113.12, possession of a controlled substance (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii]). We reject petitioner’s contention that the determination of the Hearing Officer is not supported by substantial evidence (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). “The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who prepared the report, stating that he observed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Nieves v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Valera v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rodriguez v. HerbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Nieves v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Rosario v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Grant v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kellam v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.