Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Thomas

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2005No. WD 64727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

Patricia A. Thomas (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying John A. Thomas’ (“Husband”) maintenance obligation. Wife raises four points on appeal in her challenge to the trial court’s modification of maintenance. Because Wife’s first point on appeal is dispositive, we do not address her remaining points. As explained below, we find that the trial court lacked statutory authority to modify maintenance without written agreement of the parties. Thus, the judgment modifying maintenance is reversed.

Background

Husband and Wife were married on May…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lueckenotte v. LueckenotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. Cates v. CatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Gerecke v. GereckeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Davis v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Hughes v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Susan Ann Taormina v. Marc Kenneth TaorminaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API