Legal Opinion

State v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 1998No. C952801CR; CA A92416PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant, a Tri-Met bus driver, is charged with public indecency, ORS 163.465. The state appeals from a pretrial order excluding evidence of defendant’s past sexual behavior. Defendant cross-appeals, challenging the portion of the pretrial order that denied his motion to admit exculpatory polygraph evidence. On the appeal, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part; we affirm on the cross appeal.

The indictment alleges that DH, a mentally handicapped woman who was not herself charged, performed an act of oral sex on defendant in the rear of a Tri-Met bus during a layover. Before trial,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. HamptonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Masood v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API