Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 1940No. 2039PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Roy Baker, administrator of the estate of Texas Rector, deceased, filed suit in trespass to try title to S30 acres of land in Palo Pinto County against Eugene Pierce and wife. Boyd Hart and others, who, together with Mrs. Pierce, are the heirs at law of Texas Rector, deceased, were also made parties defendant. The defendants, other than the Pierces, adopted the allegations of plaintiff’s petition and, in effect, became parties plaintiff.

The Pierces answered by plea of not guilty and general denial. They admitted the qualification of Baker as administrator of the estate of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880)Texas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. House v. ReavisTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Keys v. MasonTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Rogers v. RewardTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Dolson v. De GanahlTexas Supreme Court · 1888

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. JeanTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Champion v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  3. Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Conrad v. Artha Garza Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. War-Pak, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API