Legal Opinion

Meredith v. . Kent's

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1792Published

1Opinion of the Court

Objected by Lowther, for the plaintiff, who opposed the introduction of the testimony totis viribus, upon the ground that this was not the best evidence; as the witness might have been and was actually summoned in the cause, whilst in the State. Cited: Kinzey v. King, 28 N.C. 78; Stern v. Herren, 101 N.C. 519;State v. Means, 175 N.C. 823.(53)

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stern & Co. v. HerrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888