Legal Opinion

In re the City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames O’Malley, J.

This is a condemnation proceeding instituted by the city of New York to acquire title to the property of the Manhattan Railway Company within the lines of East Forty-second street, between Park and Third avenues. The property involved, briefly described, is the so-called “ East 42nd Street Elevated Spur,” hereinafter referred to as the spur. Four claimants have appeared, namely, the Manhattan Railway Company, owner; the Interborough Rapid Transit Company, lessee; and the Central Union Trust Company of New York and the Equitable Trust Company of New York, holders and trustees of the first and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Roberts v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. McGlynn v. SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. State v. Hudson County News Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API