Legal Opinion

Edward Charles Genter, II v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary Dept. Of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 14, 1982No. 81-5900Published

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

State prisoner, Edward Charles Genter, II appeals from the district court’s dismissal, without prejudice, of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. Genter’s petition presents one claim — /.e., a fatal variance between the indictment and proof with respect to the conspiracy charge — that was not brought before the state courts. The former Fifth Circuit has held that a federal district court must dismiss without prejudice a § 2254 petition presenting both unexhausted and exhausted claims. Galtieri v. Wainwright, 582 F.2d 348, 355 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc). This rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Gennero Galtieri v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, John Matera v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Genter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Willard Max Meacham v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API