Legal Opinion

Amend v. 485 PROPERTIES

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 2006No. S05Q1462Published

1Opinion of the Court

627 S.E.2d 565 (2006)

280 Ga. 327

AMEND

v.

485 PROPERTIES.

No. S05Q1462.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

March 13, 2006.

Thuy N. Vu, McKenna, Long & Aldridge, LLP, Bruce Perrin Brown, Atlanta, for appellant.

Jill Warner, Peter Brooks Glass, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.

THOMPSON, Justice.

By way of Amend v. 485 Properties, 409 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir.2005), the United States Court of Appeals asked this Court to decide "whether procuring cause is an element of a quantum meruit claim under Georgia law." In the context of this case, the short answer is "yes." When a real estate broker brings a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Nestle Co. v. JH EWING & SON, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Perimeter Realty v. Gapi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Van C. Argiris & Co. v. FMC Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API