Legal Opinion

In Re The Parenting & Support Of C.t.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 23, 2016No. 46104-8Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two February 23, 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II In re the Parenting and Support of: No. 46104-8-II C.T. Child. ANDRE LOUIS YOUNG, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Respondent, and CHERRY KAY THOMAS, Appellant. MELNICK, J. — Cherry Kay Thomas appeals from the trial court’ s denial of her motion to vacate a permanent parenting plan that it entered after she did not appear for trial. She argues that the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion to vacate the final order under CR 60(b)(1) when (1) her attorney…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. HomanWashington Supreme Court · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API