Commonwealth v. Ruffen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAbrams, J.
I would not reverse the convictions but would remand the matter for a hearing on the issue whether relevant evidence as to prior abuse was wrongly excluded.
1. Error in excluding the defendant’s denial at the confrontation. I conclude, as does the court, that it was error to exclude the question whether the defendant denied the accusation when confronted by the victim at the police station. I agree with the court that neither an accusation nor a denial ordinarily is admissible. See ante at 812-813. The issue, as I see it, is whether the error so misled the jurors that the defendant’s case was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- People v. ArendaMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. ChretienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.