State v. Hinkle
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury for felonious restraint in violation of Section 565.120 RSMo 19781 and sentenced to one year in the St. Louis Medium Security Institution.
Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict since it did not establish exposure of *805the victim to a substantial risk of serious physical injury. We disagree. In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, we accept as true evidence tending to support the jury’s finding and favorable inferences that can be reasonably drawn therefrom and disregard all…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PuckettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. SzymczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hand v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- MacIas v. Moreno, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
- the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- State v. WarrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988