Legal Opinion

DeBlanc v. Stancil

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2002No. 1999-CT-01074-SCTPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

814 So.2d 796 (2002)

Gail Lofton DeBLANC and David DeBlanc

v.

Mable Lofton STANCIL.

No. 1999-CT-01074-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 7, 2002.

J.C. Ainsworth, Jr., Monticello, Robert Warren Moak, Bogue Chitto, attorneys for appellants.

Raymond Osborn Boutwell, Jr., Brook-haven, attorney for appellee.

EN BANC.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

WALLER, J., for the Court.

¶ 1. In a dispute over a deed to real property, the trial court found that matters deemed admitted under the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure were sufficient to grant summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded because…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Educational Placement Services v. WilsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Earwood v. ReevesMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Martin v. SimmonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Universal Underwriters Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sawyer v. HannanMississippi Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Marriage of Leverock & HambyMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Covington County School District v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rainer v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  5. Young v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API