Nolan v. Rhodes
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
These two actions were consolidated for hearing because each one questions the validity of the apportionment of Ohio’s House of Representatives and' seeks an adjudication that the last sentence in Article XI § 2 of the Constitution of Ohio be declared unconstitutional' and void in violation of the Fourteenth. Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. This sentence in the Ohio Constitution reads: “Provided, however, that each county shall have one representative.” Since the actions involved the constitutionality of state law, the Chief Judge of the Circuit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Apportionment of State Legislature—1964Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Lisco v. LoveDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
- Germano v. KernerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
- Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.