Saba v. Stroup
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STRANKMAN, P. J.
A judgment creditor garnished cash seized by a county sheriff during an arrest of the judgment debtor on an unrelated criminal matter. The judgment debtor claimed a public policy exemption for *1256property seized by law enforcement officers from an arrestee. (Emmanuel v. Sichofsky (1926) 198 Cal. 713, 715 [247 P. 205, 48 A.L.R. 580].) The trial court denied the debtor’s claim of exemption and ordered the cash released to the creditor. We reverse the order.
Facts
In 1991, respondent Nora E. Saba was renting a room at Nevada’s Kit Kat Guest Ranch where women “entertain guests…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coffee v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Emmanuel v. SichofskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Golden Gate Candy Products Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. WillieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. BurkettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. BurkettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013