Legal Opinion

Noonan v. Thermo Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 6, 1996No. 94-P-1213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant is entitled to retrial in the Superior Court. Just as the plaintiffs right to retrial in the Superior Court was revived by the filing of the counterclaim,1 we think that the defendant’s once waived right to trial in the Superior Court (contrast Costa v. Cape Tip Invs., Inc., 35 Mass. App. Ct. 944 [1994]) was revived when the plaintiffs claim for damages was revised during trial to exceed $25,000. This would plainly be true if the defendant had filed no counterclaim, or filed one not in excess of $25,000; the second paragraph of G. L. c. 231, § 104, accords a posttrial right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerr v. PalmieriMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Kolakowski v. FinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Haddad v. PulaskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Costa v. Cape Tip Investments, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tynan v. NelsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API