Legal Opinion

McHugh v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Contract. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the defendant, to this court, on appeal, upon agreed facts, the nature of which appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The plaintiff was hired by a person having a contract with the defendant for the construction of Lonsdale Street, a public highway duly laid out in the defendant city, and, not having been paid for his work, brings this action, relying upon St. 1892, c. 270, entitled “ An Act relating to the payment for labor performed on buildings or public works owned by cities or towns.” He seasonably filed the required certificate, and the main question is whether a claim for work done in the construction of a highway is within the first section of the statute.

The section provides that “ a person to whom…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cheshire v. Adams & Cheshire Reservoir Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Bedford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  2. Browne v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Danusis v. LongoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Hull v. FerreraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API